Mortgage leads loans Rates

Not very many homeowners ever stop to question if there is a real benefit to the deduction of mortgage interest. They assume because the your mortgage lenders play on the fact that mortgage interest is tax deductible and credit card interest is not, that they are being told the truth, and will see a real benefit from the deduction of mortgage interest. Well, let me be the first to say, yes there is probably a benefit to be had, is it the advantage that many lending institutions lead us to believe? Probably not.

Now, with the advent and continued growth of the interest only loan, the benefit has just swung in the taxpayer’s favor. But, is the trade-off worth the cost? Interest only loans mean to the average home owner that there mortgage debt will last longer, well past the number of years of a standard adjustable rate mortgage or fixed rate mortgage. Yes, the interest deduction is greater, but what is the cost of the missed opportunity to do something else with your money, 10 or 15 years from now? Will the tax benefit outweigh the financial cost of adding 10 or 15 years to the life of your mortgage?

Very few consumers are actually as tax savvy as they need to be, in the area of mortgage interest deduction and how to calculate actual savings. This means that very few consumers are actually aware of the real benefits and the real costs associated with their mortgage and their tax status. How can you determine the real benefit? It will require some effort on your part, in one of two ways: You can educate yourself about the tax and mortgage regulations, or you can seek the advice of a trusted financial advisor. The keyword here is trusted. You must take the time to establish a relationship with a financial advisor with whom you feel comfortable, and with whom you can communicate and trust.

The information that you provide to a financial advisor or tax analyst, will enable them to give you advice that fits your individual and unique situation. Every individual situation is different, and much of the tax benefit is dependent upon your individual income levels.

There is often a real seesaw in this relationship. In the early years, when your earnings are low, your tax benefit from mortgage interest paid is much greater. Then, as you age and your wage earning potential increases, your benefit from the mortgage interest deduction decreases. Unless of course, you can find a way to drastically reduce your adjusted gross income. Many individuals do this through the option of self-employment. This makes better use of your income dollars, and allows for a greater tax deduction on home mortgage interest.

The most important thing you can do for your financial health is to seek the advice of a trained professional, early in your adult life. Many decisions that you make during your twenties and early thirties will affect your financial health and your tax liability levels for 20 or 30 years to come. Your mortgage is one of those decisions.

Interest only loans, fixed rate mortgages, adjustable mortgages, or any of the other many options available to borrowers will have a different affect upon your individual situation. Many of these loans are structured to provide an imbalance of interest versus principal allotment of the payment total, during the first few years of the loan. The interest only loan is just that: all of your monthly payment is an interest payment on the principal. And yes, under the right conditions this is a truly great benefit when you file your income tax return; but the keyword is the “right” conditions. Otherwise, you’re not reaping the benefit you could possibly receive had you chosen a different loan option, or if your income levels were different.

I make no pretense that the American Tax System is a tangled web, and a maze of tax codes, laws, and regulations. But there is benefit to the mortgage interest and your tax liability, if you take the time to discover exactly what your options are, and how to best benefit from all the choices you have.

Let’s first define what private mortgage insurance actually is, and why you might be required to purchase the insurance. Private mortgage insurance is an insurance purchased to protect the lender, not the borrower. The borrower however pays for the mortgage insurance, and this is provided to the lender instead of the 20% down payment normally required when purchasing real estate. The insurance provides the difference between the fair market value of the home and the actual price a lender may be able to sell the property for, in case of a default on the loan. Normally, the lender will require a 20% down payment and forgo the private mortgage insurance option. However, under certain circumstances if the buyer has an excellent credit rating, is well known to the lender, and is deemed to be low risk, private mortgage insurance may be an option offered by the lender.

The current mortgage market is flooded with such varied products as the interest only loan and the 125 loans and private mortgage insurance seems to be a thing of the past. You rarely encounter a situation when the buyer is required to purchase the private mortgage insurance; those situations most likely to continue to require the purchase of the private mortgage insurance are those where the lender is a traditional lending institution. Mortgage companies have long since ceased requiring borrowers to purchase private mortgage insurance.

Mortgage investors, such as the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs, have recently come to the aid of the borrower by introducing an option to the primary mortgage market that allows borrowers to pay as little as 5% down and purchase only enough mortgage insurance to cover 25% of the loan; this creates a potential citing situation for the borrower. The borrower may pay a slightly higher interest rate in order to lower the cost of insurance that the advantage lays here: mortgage interest is fully tax deductible, private mortgage insurance is not.

There’s another option, also regulated by the federal government and passed into law in 1999, known as the Homeowners Protection Act of 1998 established rules for regulation of private mortgage insurance requirements once a homeowner reaches a level of 20% equity. What the law requires, in layman’s terms, is that a lending institution must notify you once your equity levels reach 20% of the appraised value of the home. Once you the kind of 20% equity level, you must be given the option to drop private mortgage insurance. If this proposal had passed into law some 20 years ago, it would have been met with great resistance among the lending community; today, the interest only loan and loans that offer mortgages in excess of the appraised value of the home overshadow the effect of the 1998 homeowner’s act.

The regulations passed into law by the 1998 Homeowner’s Act do not affect FHA or VA loans, and many of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs have additional stipulations and requirements in addition to the 1998 law. Also, your state laws and regulations may also affect your insurance requirements. Due to the recent increases in real estate pricing, and as a result the increased level of a mortgage borrowing requests, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have increased their loan limits and private mortgage insurance limitations. They even the secondary market has a need for the private mortgage insurance requirements, thanks to the booming real estate economy.

Many homeowners seem to mistake the private mortgage insurance purchased in order to secure the loan, with that of the homeowner’s liability insurance. Lenders are responsible for making clear the distinction between private mortgage insurance purchased to protect the lender versus the homeowner’s liability insurance purchased to protect the homeowner. Both forms of insurance will need to be purchased, and the borrower will be responsible for payment of both insurance premiums.

The Homeowner’s Act of 1998, served as a way for the borrower to decrease their monthly mortgage payment, once the 20% equity level have been established; this seems like a small contribution when you examine the mortgage products offered today, that do not require the borrower to establish any equity.

As you begin your search for the perfect home, and you research your mortgage loan options, the tax consequences of a mortgage loan with mortgage interest doesn’t ever cross the minds of most consumers. But as you decide which product you need, or think you need, the tax repercussions and benefits should play a role, even if it’s a small one, in the final decision.

For many consumers, the first thought that’s given to their tax return, and tax liability, comes from the mortgage lender. Quite often, mortgages are touted as being one of the best venues for reducing your tax liability at the end of the year. Yes, your mortgage interest payments will reduce your tax liability, but is that your ultimate goal? Is that why you’re looking at mortgage packages? No. Your ultimate goal in choosing a mortgage is to pay for your home.

Every situation in this case, and this case would apply to the average consumer shopping for a mortgage loan, is probably not going to get that much benefit from the tax deduction that comes from their mortgage interest payments. The average consumer should first look at their monthly payment and choose a mortgage based on affordability, not tax liability.

The smart consumer will not allow the flashy ads displayed by many mortgage lenders to influence their mortgage loan decision. The smart consumer will examine the interest level, the term of the mortgage loan, the affordability of the monthly payment, and base their decision upon their ability to pay in relation to the mortgage that achieves their primary purpose: the payout of the loan.

You and I rarely consider the impact of any financial decision on itemized deduction statement; however many of those decisions do affect itemized deductions. Our itemized deductions and major portion of our tax liability? No. Do they contribute to a reduction in tax liability? Yes. The relativity of the contribution when contrasted to the required time in examining the actual benefit we derive from the itemized deduction calculations warrants the point mute. It’s just not worth the effort.

If you happen to be in your mid-40s and your purchasing your first home, I would suggest that you consult a financial adviser prior to making a mortgage decision; however most individuals in their mid-40s would already realize the benefit of a financial adviser. A young couple purchasing their first home would truly benefit from the interest deduction, not to the extent however off more than $40-$50 of the bottom-line for their tax liability. As you age, and your way to earning power increases, the benefit of the itemized deduction decreases. Does the average person understand how tax is configured? No. The only person who can truly enlighten a consumer would be a tax professional, and many average individuals would spend more money in the determination of the benefit than they would reap.

The new guy on the mortgage loan law, known as the interest only mortgage loan will bring the greatest benefit to the consumer. The interest-only lawn in the amount of interest you can deduct on your tax return are one and the same, but does the benefit of the mortgage interest deduction outweigh the added expense of an additional five years on the mortgage loan?

What about the mortgage loan refinance? Any equity you remove from your home in the form of cash that can be used to pay down or pay all high interest credit card accounts will transfer a nondeductible expense to your deductible expenses. However you should remember the trade-off you now owe more against your home, and you have used your equity reserves. Was the deduction worth the trade? Many times the answer is no. For many consumers, paying off high-interest credit card debt only increases the probability of additional credit card charges. In other words, not only have use your equity, you’ve returned to high-interest debt.

Prior to a final decision of your mortgage along product, take a moment to review your tax situation. Each situation is unique. The lower your income, the greater the benefit, but rarely is the benefit worth the cost. Behold, the Tax Man, cometh.