Archive for February, 2009

Real Estate and Mortgage Loans

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

In case you haven’t noticed the mortgage market and the real estate market have been blazing a trail into the record books. Never before has there been such explosive, sustained growth of these two markets. The key factor here is that one seems to feed off the other. Is this a good thing, or are the two markets headed for a collapse?

You have analysts that will argue for either side. But, you need to have a better understanding of how this process works, and what elements have come together to allow this kind of growth, before you can accept or disprove either argument. What has happened to spur this kind of growth? Well, there are several key factors that managed to come together at precisely the right time, some of them attributable to natural disaster that has generated a booming market.

The first contributor was the falling interest rate that has leveled out around 6 – 7%; the second great contributor has been the increase in mortgage loan options. There are mortgage products out there to fit every type of buyer. The third contributor, (and this one is purely from nature) was the horrific hurricane seasons of the past couple of years, including the season we had this year.

How have all these elements come together to generate growth? Here’s exactly how: lower interest rates meant cheaper monthly payments, refinancing options were open, and people could afford to buy bigger homes for less. Add to that mix a more varied loan market, and you have an increase in buying, selling, and building. If you also throw in the fact that hurricanes destroyed massive quantities of homes along the coast, and most will rebuild, you have a burgeoning real estate and housing growth market.

We have also managed to create an environment very conducive to investment, construction, and resort development. Now, if you factor in a booming market for investors, you have a prime situation for increases in real estate value, increases in construction, and increases in mortgage loans.

How does the average citizen ready to buy or build a home interpret all this information? Well, it creates a wonderful situation for the homeowner looking to sell a home, simply because the value of the home should show a tremendous increase over the purchase value, especially if you’ve owned the home for more than 10 years. However, if you’re buying or building, you’re not going to like the situation. Why? Because home prices are up, thanks to the rising real estate prices, and so are is the price of building materials, needed to build a new home. We can attribute much of this to high gas prices and hurricanes. The good news, in all this, is the low interest rates. You can still borrow at an extremely affordable interest rate.

For the consumer shopping the market, you need to really educate yourself about the rising costs of real estate, the local values in your community, and what mortgage products would most benefit you, when you consider your individual objectives. If you’re like most, you aren’t buying your home for an investment, and you aren’t buying with the intent to sell in a few short years. In the market of today, it would be a wise choice to meet with a financial advisor; someone that has a background in finance, and can help you to clearly define your objects, and choose a mortgage that will reflect those objectives.

Many of the individuals, who are the doomsayers, seem to think that the market can’t sustain this type of growth. That is has occurred too quickly, and like the bubble of the stock market, will burst, leaving many homeowners and mortgage lenders “holding the bag” so to speak. But, you also have many of the intellectuals that say the real estate market was due a burst of growth; that it is normal, healthy, and we should have no trouble sustaining this type of growth. Whatever the end result, right now, the real estate market and the mortgage market are hot items; if you own real estate, you’ve hit the jackpot. If you’re looking to buy, get ready to pay.

Private Mortgage Insurance

Saturday, February 21st, 2009

Chances are unless you’re right in the throes of purchasing your home, you’ve never even heard of private mortgage insurance. But, if you intend to purchase a home and you don’t want put the 20% down that traditional lending institutions require, you’re going to become very familiar with private mortgage insurance. What is private mortgage insurance and who pays for private mortgage insurance? This article will take the opportunity to discuss private mortgage insurance and why you’re required to purchase it; we’ll also examine the latest federal regulations governing private mortgage insurance.

Let’s first define what private mortgage insurance actually is, and why you might be required to purchase the insurance. Private mortgage insurance is an insurance purchased to protect the lender, not the borrower. The borrower however pays for the mortgage insurance, and is provided to the lender instead of the 20% down payment normally required when purchasing real estate. The insurance provides the difference between the fair market value of the home and the actual price a lender may be able to sell the property for, in case of a default on the loan. Normally, the lender will require a 20% down payment and forgo the private mortgage insurance option. However, under certain circumstances if the buyer has an excellent credit card debt rating, is well known to the lender, and is deemed to be low risk, private mortgage insurance may be an option offered by the lender.

The current mortgage market seems to be flooded with such varied products as the interest only loan and the 125 loans that private mortgage insurance seems to be a thing of the past. You rarely encounter a situation when the buyer is required to purchase the private mortgage insurance; those situations most likely to continue to require the purchase of the private mortgage insurance are those where the lender is a traditional lending institution. Mortgage companies have long since ceased requiring borrowers to purchase private mortgage insurance.

Mortgage investors, such as the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs, have recently come to the aid of the borrower by introducing an option to the primary mortgage market that allows borrowers to pay as little as 5% down and purchase only enough mortgage insurance to cover 25% of the loan; this creates a potential citing situation for the borrower. The borrower may pay a slightly higher interest rate in order to lower the cost of insurance that the advantage lays here: mortgage interest is fully tax deductible, private mortgage insurance is not.

There’s another option, also regulated by the federal government and passed into law in 1999, known as the homeowners protection act of 1998 established rules for regulation of private mortgage insurance requirements once a homeowner reaches a level of 20% equity. What the law requires, in layman’s terms, is that a lending institution must notify you once your equity levels reach 20% of the appraised value of the home. Once you the kind of 20% equity level, you must be given the option to drop private mortgage insurance. If this proposal had passed into law some 20 years ago, it would have been met with great resistance among the lending community; today, the interest only loan and loans that offer mortgages in excess of the appraised value of the home overshadow the effect of the 1998 homeowner’s act.

Many homeowners seem to mistake the private mortgage insurance purchased in order to secure the loan, with that of the homeowner’s liability insurance. Lenders are responsible for making clear the distinction between private mortgage insurance purchased to protect the lender versus the homeowner’s liability insurance purchased to protect the homeowner. Both forms of insurance will need to be purchased, and the borrower will be responsible for payment of both insurance premiums.

Quite often as we go through the mortgage process, we encounter many unexpected expenses; private mortgage insurance is normally one of those unexpected expenses. As a consumer if you’re contemplating the purchase of a home, contact your local lending institution, or a mortgage company in your area, and asked for information concerning the purchase of a home for first-time homeowners. The information you’re provided should contain all the terms, conditions and terminology explanations that you will need in order to make an educated decision when choosing lenders and homes.

PMI and the 1998 Homeowner’s Act

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

Let’s first define what private mortgage insurance actually is, and why you might be required to purchase the insurance. Private mortgage insurance is an insurance purchased to protect the lender, not the borrower. The borrower however pays for the mortgage insurance, and this is provided to the lender instead of the 20% down payment normally required when purchasing real estate. The insurance provides the difference between the fair market value of the home and the actual price a lender may be able to sell the property for, in case of a default on the loan. Normally, the lender will require a 20% down payment and forgo the private mortgage insurance option. However, under certain circumstances if the buyer has an excellent credit rating, is well known to the lender, and is deemed to be low risk, private mortgage insurance may be an option offered by the lender.

The current mortgage market is flooded with such varied products as the interest only loan and the 125 loans and private mortgage insurance seems to be a thing of the past. You rarely encounter a situation when the buyer is required to purchase the private mortgage insurance; those situations most likely to continue to require the purchase of the private mortgage insurance are those where the lender is a traditional lending institution. Mortgage companies have long since ceased requiring borrowers to purchase private mortgage insurance.

Mortgage investors, such as the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs, have recently come to the aid of the borrower by introducing an option to the primary mortgage market that allows borrowers to pay as little as 5% down and purchase only enough mortgage insurance to cover 25% of the loan; this creates a potential citing situation for the borrower. The borrower may pay a slightly higher interest rate in order to lower the cost of insurance that the advantage lays here: mortgage interest is fully tax deductible, private mortgage insurance is not.

There’s another option, also regulated by the federal government and passed into law in 1999, known as the Homeowners Protection Act of 1998 established rules for regulation of private mortgage insurance requirements once a homeowner reaches a level of 20% equity. What the law requires, in layman’s terms, is that a lending institution must notify you once your equity levels reach 20% of the appraised value of the home. Once you the kind of 20% equity level, you must be given the option to drop private mortgage insurance. If this proposal had passed into law some 20 years ago, it would have been met with great resistance among the lending community; today, the interest only loan and loans that offer mortgages in excess of the appraised value of the home overshadow the effect of the 1998 homeowner’s act.

The regulations passed into law by the 1998 Homeowner’s Act do not affect FHA or VA loans, and many of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs have additional stipulations and requirements in addition to the 1998 law. Also, your state laws and regulations may also affect your insurance requirements. Due to the recent increases in real estate pricing, and as a result the increased level of a mortgage borrowing requests, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have increased their loan limits and private mortgage insurance limitations. They even the secondary market has a need for the private mortgage insurance requirements, thanks to the booming real estate economy.

Many homeowners seem to mistake the private mortgage insurance purchased in order to secure the loan, with that of the homeowner’s liability insurance. Lenders are responsible for making clear the distinction between private mortgage insurance purchased to protect the lender versus the homeowner’s liability insurance purchased to protect the homeowner. Both forms of insurance will need to be purchased, and the borrower will be responsible for payment of both insurance premiums.

The Homeowner’s Act of 1998, served as a way for the borrower to decrease their monthly mortgage payment, once the 20% equity level have been established; this seems like a small contribution when you examine the mortgage products offered today, that do not require the borrower to establish any equity.